Testing for Intelligence
Continuous assessment affords the child and teacher an authentic view of the child’s strengths and weaknesses, thus providing an opportunity to implement experiences to facilitate and enhance these areas. Assessing children’s learning is necessary for planning experiences to expand a child’s learning and reinforce skills already mastered. All children learn in a style of their own. There are seven documented learning styles; visual, aural, verbal, physical, logical, social, and solitary (learning-styles-on-line, 2011). Some children learn using only one style and others use a combination of styles. According to Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory, the use of I.Q. testing results are limited in accurately assessing a child’s ability to learn comprehend. His theory states there are eight different intelligences that are found in adults and children (Multiple intelligence, 2013).
Children who learn through different intelligences are sometimes labeled as learning disabled, ADD, or underachievers because their particular style of learning doesn’t fit the traditional linguistic or logical mathematical classroom. Art, music, role play, cooperative learning, and field trips are suggested classroom techniques that teachers could use to improve children’s learning acquisition (Multiple intelligence, 2013).
Assessment in Scotland
England uses multiple methods in-school and in the combination of school-based and external assessments used for accountability.
Assessment is conducted during the daily learning and teaching. Teachers learn their students by watching and listening to them as the write and how they answer questions. Samplings of the child’s work is collected and feedback is used to adapt learning and teaching and revisit areas the child has not mastered. To determine the child’s success the teacher accesses the student in these three areas:
The student must have achieved a breadth of learning across the experiences and outcomes for an aspect of the curriculum can respond to the level of challenge set out in the experiences and outcomes and are moving forward to more challenging learning in some aspects, and can apply what they have learned in new and unfamiliar situations.
To ensure quality standards are met and outcomes for children improved subsystem of monitoring, self-evaluation and planning for improvement is in place (Transforming lives through learning).
References
(2011). Retrieved from learning-styles-on-line: http://www.learning-styles-online.com/inventory/
Multiple intelligence. (2013). Retrieved from Americas Institute for Learning and Human Development: http://www.institute4learning.com/multiple-intelligences.php
Transforming lives through learning. (n.d.). Retrieved from Education Scotland: http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/


Comments

SandezL said…
I enjoyed reading your post and I agree with you in how we all have different learning styles.Many people recognize that each person prefers different learning styles and techniques. Learning styles group common ways that people learn. Everyone has a mix of learning styles. Some people may find that they have a dominant style of learning, with far less use of the other styles. Others may find that they use different styles in different circumstances. There is no right mix (www.usd.edu). Every year I get different children in my class and they have a different learning style. Same with my own children, I have three children and they have a different learning style. It amazes me how many different learning styles makes us learn different. Great post!!
Gigi said…
Interestingly enough, most other countries seem to use standardized tests along with external assessments to not only measure intelligence but to gain a better perspective overall of how students learn. I think that is more logical than our current practices here in the United States.

I am a great test-taker! I can learn the material and then ace the exam. I rarely experience test anxiety. Trouble is, I do not remember most of what I wrote after the exam is finished. I think that is unfair as their are many students that are horrible test-takers but they really know the material.

We have got to come up with a better way to measure intelligence as the old ways are pretty outdated and overrated.

Popular posts from this blog

Words of Inspiration and Motivation

Establishing Professional Contacts and Expanding Resource

Scholar Practioiners as Program Evaluators